Biological defence through the civil protection system analysis and suggestions from the perspective of CBRN defence doctrine

Authors

  • Zvonko Orehovec University of Applied Sciences Velika Gorica
  • Karlo Orehovec University of Applied Sciences Velika Gorica
  • Marina Črnko University of Applied Sciences Velika Gorica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51381/adrs.v5i1-2.429

Keywords:

biological defence, civil protection, pandemic response

Abstract

Natural and anthropogenic biological threats very often cause mass casualties and destruction, with long-term repercussions to the economy, welfare, security and political stability, and ultimately, to the future progress of the state and its society. For these reasons, the EU Member States have developed national and joint doctrines and strategies that provide for defence systems against the above threats, based on mass mobilization and mass response of all available capacities. The joint military response resides within NATO’s Joint CBRN Defence apparatus, while the civilian counterpart system is within the EU’s Civil Protection Mechanism. At the national level, each country develops its own, yet compatible systems. In the Republic of Croatia, strategic documents and laws on the development of the Homeland Security System and the Civil Protection System have been adopted. Biological threats, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, are among such developments and require a systemic response. However, hardly anywhere in the world, not even in the EU and its Member States, have the relevant response systems worked.

References

AEP-45 (2014.). Warning and Reporting and Hazard Prediction of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Incidents (Operators Manual)
AJP 3.8 (2012.). Allied Joint Doctrine for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defence AJP-3.8(a) Edition a Aersion
ATP 3-11-37 (2013.). Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Chemical, Biological, radiological and Nuclear Reconnaissance and Surveillance
Bokan, S.; Orehovec, Z.; Price-Sanders, B. (editors) (1998, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007.).; Proceedings of Chemical and Biological Medical Treatment Symposium, CB MTS Industry II (2001), III (2003), IV (2005), V (2007), VI (2009), VII (2011), VIII (2013); World Congress on Chemical and Biological Terrorism; Dubrovnik, Croatia, ISSN:1092-7255
Decision 1131/2013. Decision (EU) No 1313/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2013/1313/oj
FM 3-11.5 (2006.). CBRN Decontamination, Multiservice Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Chemical, Biological, radiological, and Nuclear Decontamination
FM 8-9 (1996.), NATO Handbook on the Medical aspects of NBC Defensive Operations
JP 3-11 (2013.). Operations in Chemical, Biological, radiological, and Nuclear Environments
JP 3-41 (2012.). Chemical, Biological, radiological, and Nuclear Consequence Management

Downloads

Published

2024-01-25

How to Cite

Orehovec, Z., Orehovec, K., & Črnko, M. (2024). Biological defence through the civil protection system analysis and suggestions from the perspective of CBRN defence doctrine. Annals of Disaster Risk Sciences, 5(1-2). https://doi.org/10.51381/adrs.v5i1-2.429

Issue

Section

Articles